Rechercher dans ce blog

Tuesday, October 31, 2023

RIP Touch Bar: Apple is getting rid of MacBooks with the controversial touch screen at the top of keyboards - Business Insider India

  • Apple has given its controversial Touch Bar the ax.
  • The company will stop selling new MacBook Pro laptops with the touch screen above the keyboard.
Advertisement

Apple is doing away with one of its most controversial MacBook features after seven years. The company is discontinuing the 13-inch MacBook Pro, and with it, the love-it-or-hate-it Touch Bar.

The touch-sensitive OLED display above the keyboard replaced physical buttons for functions like volume and screen brightness, and also offered things like typing suggestions and shortcuts to emoji and Siri. It also showed different options specific to the apps or systems you had open at the time, like showing your different tabs when you're using Safari, for example.

Apple will replace the laptop with the 14-inch MacBook Pro with the new M3 chip, announced at the company's "Scary Fast" Halloween-themed event Monday night. Some 13-inch MacBook Pros didn't have a Touch Bar, but either way Apple will no longer sell new 13-inch MacBook Pros.

Complimentary Tech Event
Transform talent with learning that works
Capability development is critical for businesses who want to push the envelope of innovation.Discover how business leaders are strategizing around building talent capabilities and empowering employee transformation.Know More

The Touch Bar has been a divisive feature since it was first introduced in 2016. Some users liked the variety of different options it could offer in one panel, while others felt it was unnecessary or too prone to accidental taps. Some people also just missed the tactile buttons that the dynamic touch-screen strip replaced.

The company took a step toward nixing the Touch Bar in 2021, when it got rid of the Touch Bar from the 14- and 16-inch MacBook Pro and went back to tactile function keys.

Advertisement


"There's no doubt that our Pro customers love that full-size, tactile feel of those function keys, and so that's the decision we made. And we feel great about that," said Greg Joswiak, Apple's senior vice president of worldwide marketing, in a WIRED interview that year.

Adblock test (Why?)


RIP Touch Bar: Apple is getting rid of MacBooks with the controversial touch screen at the top of keyboards - Business Insider India
Read More

Windows 11 has native support for multiple compression formats - Gizchina.com

Microsoft has announced that Windows 11 will include native support for multiple formats, such as 7-Zip and RAR files. This development implies that users will no longer have to rely on additional tools or the standard Windows zip utility to compress files. During the Build developer conference, Microsoft shared its strategy to offer compatibility with a wide range of archive formats, including tar, gz, and others. This enhancement meets a persistent request from the Windows user base.

Windows 11 Dynamic Lighting

While earlier iterations of the operating system had built-in support for zip archiving, this often proved inadequate when compared to alternative solutions. As a result, formats like 7-Zip and RAR necessitated the use of third-party tools such as WinRAR. The company recently pushed the Win11 23H2 version to the Release Preview channel. This new update brings support for native RAR and 7-zip files to the system.

Gizchina News of the week


Benefits of Native Support for Multiple Compression Formats

Better Performance

Native support for multiple compression formats will improve the performance of archive functionality during compression on Windows. This means that users will be able to compress and decompress files more quickly and efficiently. There will not be any need to search for third-party tools.

Better Accessibility

Native support for multiple compression formats will make it easier for users to work with different types of compressed files. Users will no longer have to download and install additional software to work with formats like 7-Zip and RAR. This will increase accessibility and make it easier for users to share files with others who may be using different compression formats.

Windows 11

Better Integration with Windows

Native support for multiple compression formats will be integrated into the Windows operating system. This means that users will be able to access these features directly from the Windows Explorer interface. It will also make it easier for users to work with compressed files without having to switch between different apps.

Conclusion

The announcement of native support for multiple compression formats in Windows 11 is a big development. It will benefit users in many ways. With improved performance, increased accessibility, and better integration with Windows, users will be able to work with compressed files more efficiently and effectively. This development meets a persistent request from the Windows user base and will make it easier for users to share files with others who may be using different compression formats.

Source/VIA :

Adblock test (Why?)


Windows 11 has native support for multiple compression formats - Gizchina.com
Read More

Monday, October 30, 2023

Klipsch debuts Music City series of portable Bluetooth speakers - TechHive

Klipsch has announced the Music City series of battery-powered Bluetooth speakers, named after American cities famous for their music scenes: Austin, Detroit, and Nashville.

The 14-ounce Klipsch Austin ($99) is the smallest of the three, featuring a 1.5-inch driver and dual passive radiators in cube-like 4.1 x 4.1 x 1.7-inch (HxWxD) enclosure. Klipsch describes the ultra-portable Austin as having been “inspired by the passion and artistry that makes its namesake the live music capital of the world and designed to take the concert anywhere you go.” The speaker promises 12 hours of battery life.

This news is part of TechHive’s in-depth reporting on the best Bluetooth speakers.

Klipsch Austin Bluetooth speaker

The Klipsch Austin is the smallest in Klipsch’s all-new Music City series of portable Bluetooth speakers. 

Klipsch

The larger Klipsch Nashville ($149) offers twin 2.25-inch drivers and dual passive radiators housed in a wider, squatter 3.1 x 7 x 3.2-inch box. Klipsch says this speaker’s dual opposing drivers will deliver a 360-degree soundstage that will immerse listeners “in the soulful melodies and rich musical heritage of Music City USA.” The two larger speakers are apparently stereo players. The battery in the 2.4-pound Nashville promises up to 24 hours of battery life.

The biggest of the three speakers in the new series, the 4.1 x 13.1 x 4.8-inch Klipsch Detroit is outfitted with dual 3-inch drivers and 1-inch tweeters, plus four force-cancelling passive radiators. The $299 Detroit is the least portable of the new lineup, weighing in at 5.5 pounds, although it does have a handle like the Austin (the Nashville, which is the only speaker to promise 360-degree audio, does not). In spite of the number of drivers, Klipsch promises the Detroit will also deliver 24 hours of battery life.

Klipsch Nashville Bluetooth speaker

The mid-line Klipsch Nashville is outfitted with twin 2.25-inch drivers and dual passive radiators. The top-of-the-line Detroit is pictured up top.

Klipsch

All three speakers are outfitted with Bluetooth 5.3 radios and can be controlled with the Klipsch Connect app, which offers EQ controls and other personalized settings. The series also supports the Klipsch Broadcast Mode that allows the speakers to be grouped together with up to 10 other Bluetooth-capable Klipsch speakers, including the One Plus and the Three Plus tabletop speakers that came to market about this time in 2022.

Being portable speakers, Klipsch has assigned all three of its new Music City-series weatherization ratings of IP67, meaning they’re impervious to dust ingress and that they can withstand immersion in up to one meter of water for 30 minutes.

Klipsch tells us the Austin and Nashville are available for pre-order now; the top-of-the-line Detroit will arrive sometime in 2024.

Adblock test (Why?)


Klipsch debuts Music City series of portable Bluetooth speakers - TechHive
Read More

Sunday, October 29, 2023

Tiny carbon ‘flowers’ turn light to heat at unrivalled efficiency, IIT team finds - The Hindu

To synthesise a carbon nanostructure that was “blacker than black”, Ananya Sah and C. Subramaniam started with a material that was white.

In Prof. Subramaniam’s laboratory in IIT Bombay, Dr. Sah heated a special form of silicon dust called DFNS (for dendritic fibrous nanosilica) in a furnace. Once heated, she introduced acetylene gas into the chamber. The white powder turned black – a sign that carbon had been deposited on the DFNS.

Then she collected the black powder and treated it with a strong chemical that dissolved the DFNS away, leaving carbon particles behind.

The structure of the silicon particles – 50-1,200 nanometers in size – resembled spikes arranged around a sphere. With the silicon filling taken away, what was left behind were little carbon beads whose surfaces were pocked with cone-shaped pits. In effect, the beads were spherical nanostructures composed of carbon cones.

Unprecedented efficiency

When Dr. Sah and Prof. Subramaniam examined some of these spheres under a microscope, they were struck by the particles’ appearance: like tiny marigold flowers, made only of carbon. They called the material carbon nanoflorets.

In a paper published in September in ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces, a team led by Prof. Subramaniam reported that these nanoflorets could absorb sunlight at many frequencies and convert it to heat with an unprecedented efficiency.

The nanoflorets also didn’t easily dissipate the heat generated into the environment, making the material a good candidate to heat other materials, like water, using solar energy, the paper noted.

Vivek Polshettiwar, professor of chemistry at the Tata Institute of Fundamental Research, Mumbai, and leader of the team that invented DFNS in 2010, told this writer that the study’s results underscore the particles’ “excellent societal utility”.

Two different techniques

According to Prof. Polshettiwar, this isn’t the first time such carbon nanomaterials have been synthesised. In 2018, his own group had reported identical structures that it dubbed “carbon nanospheres with wrinkled cages”.

But, he added, his and Prof. Subramaniam’s work differed in the techniques used to deposit carbon on the DFNS template (although this didn’t affect the characteristics of the product).

Prof. Polshettiwar’s team used formaldehyde-phenol polymerisation chemistry whereas Prof. Subramaniam’s team used chemical vapour deposition (CVD). In CVD, volatile compounds like acetylene are used to deposit a thin carbon film on the silicon-dust template.

‘Blacker than black’

The new study sprang from what Prof. Subramaniam called a “keen observation” by Dr. Sah: the nanoflorets were “extremely black – blacker than black” in colour, she had reportedly said.

“Anything which is very black basically means that it is a good absorber of light,” according to Prof. Subramaniam.

What happens to the absorbed light? The team conducted experiments to demonstrate that the nanoflorets converted the light energy they absorbed into thermal energy – a process called solar-thermal conversion – with a remarkable efficiency of 87%.

This is the “highest among known materials,” the authors wrote in their paper.

Unusual properties

The carbon nanoflorets’ high efficiency comes from three properties.

First: the nanoflorets absorb three frequencies in sunlight – infrared, visible light, and ultraviolet. Other common materials for solar-thermal conversion, like photovoltaic materials used in solar panels, absorb only visible and ultraviolet light.

More than half of the energy in sunlight arrives to the earth as infrared radiation. So the nanoflorets can absorb much more energy from the sun.

The other two properties responsible for the material’s high light-heat conversion efficiency are a result of its shape. As light falls on the material, the carbon cones ensure that very little is reflected back. Instead, most light is reflected internally.

A simple schematic diagram showing the path of sunlight insight a carbon nanofloret.

A simple schematic diagram showing the path of sunlight insight a carbon nanofloret. | Photo Credit: Sayantan Datta

Second, one risk with a material that can convert sunlight into heat is that it can also lose it to its environment. The carbon nanoflorets don’t, however, thanks to long-range disorder: parts of the structure at some distance from each other possess different physical properties. As a result, heat waves in the material aren’t carried over long distances, reducing the amount of heat dissipated away.

Taken together, the carbon nanoflorets efficiently absorb sunlight and convert to a remarkable degree into heat, Prof. Subramaniam said.

Patented product

In their study, the researchers reported that a 1 m sq. coating of carbon nanoflorets on a surface could vaporise 5 litres of water in an hour – which, Prof. Subramaniam said in a statement, is “at least five-times better than commercial solar stills”.

The researchers have also applied for and recently received a patent for the nanoflorets, and are excited about commercialising them.

T. Pradeep, a professor of chemistry at IIT Madras, told this writer that the material is ripe for commercialisation because carbon is inexpensive and the nanoflorets can generate heat sustainably, without having to burn fossil fuels.

“India is a country that is blessed with a lot of light, but also has areas that have low temperatures,” Prof. Pradeep said. In such regions, the nanofloret coatings can help heat up housing and sterilise surfaces in hospitals, he added.

When Prof. Subramaniam’s team applied to the IIT Bombay Alumni Network for funding to commercialise the material, one of the persons who evaluated the proposal was Hemant Kanakia, an alumnus and serial entrepreneur. Dr. Kanakia called the proposal the “best among the lot of 36 proposals” he checked.

Other than the nanoflorets’ remarkable properties, they could generate ecologically sustainable heating, he said.

No risks found so far

“Given that the material can be coated on a vast variety of surfaces, it can heat up those using sunlight. If one were to use a coating of this material to heat up their homes, they would be doing so in an ecologically sound way while reducing the carbon footprint,” Dr. Kanakia added.

According to an institute statement, Prof. Subramaniam’s team has already found that the nanoflorets can be coated on paper, metal, and terracotta clay.

Prof. Subramaniam also said that the nanoflorets pose no risk of inhalation: “once coated, the adhesion is nearly as good as paint on a wall.” When they tested the stability of the coating, they found that it had a “minimum lifetime of 8 years”.

Prof. Polshettiwar agreed, adding that more tests could clarify whether the coating might degrade faster under more heat or sunlight.

Efficient heating solution

“It is remarkable that a professor who started out with a fundamental discovery was actually interested in going beyond writing an academic paper and seeking an actual application,” according to Dr. Kanakia, who studied electrical engineering at IIT Bombay. “We need more such researchers in our education system.”

Prof. Subramaniam is currently building a startup to be incubated by IIT Bombay. Its first goal is to scale up the production of the coating, which it will then sell to companies looking for efficient heating solutions.

The researchers are also studying the nanoflorets’ other physical and chemical properties and potential applications. “Given its unique structural and morphological properties, we believe it has a wide range of unexplored applications,” Dr. Sah said.

Sayantan Datta (they/them) are a queer-trans freelance science writer, communicator and journalist. They are currently a faculty member at Krea University and tweet at @queersprings.

Adblock test (Why?)


Tiny carbon ‘flowers’ turn light to heat at unrivalled efficiency, IIT team finds - The Hindu
Read More

Pixel 8 Pro vs iPhone 15 Pro camera shootout: Which is the best 'Pro' on the market? - Android Authority

Pixel 8 Pro vs iPhone 15 Pro camera shootout

Robert Triggs / Android Authority

Apple and Google are two brands that pride themself on best-in-class camera phones. They’ve built reputations on it and continue to play to this strength with the latest iPhone 15 Pro and Pixel 8 Pro. This begs the question: if you have $999 to spend on your next smartphone upgrade, what should an avid photographer buy?

Yes, but it depends on the situation. Here’s the TLDR from our article:

  • The two phones have great primary cameras. The Pixel 8 Pro looks more muted and realistic, while Apple targets more contrast and color pop.
  • The iPhone 15 Pro still has issues with yellow tints and occasional under-exposure.
  • Google’s ultrawide camera fits more in, but Apple’s camera suffers from fewer lens distortion issues.
  • Google’s Pixel 8 Pro takes better-looking pictures when using long-range zoom.
  • Both phones take excellent selfies, but the iPhone 15 Pro is more consistent in tricky lighting.
  • Overall, the Google Pixel 8 Pro is the most consistent camera across a wider range of scenarios, but the Apple iPhone 15 Pro still takes scintillating pictures most of the time.

Pixel 8 Pro vs iPhone 15 Pro camera specs

Before the pictures, a quick recap of what the Pixel 8 Pro and iPhone 15 Pro offer in their rear camera arrays. Both pack a high-resolution primary sensor, an ultrawide lens to fit more in, and a telephoto camera for longer-range snaps. It’s a tried and tested formula that offers plenty of versatility across shooting situations. However, peer into the specifics and there are some key differences worth highlighting.

First, the Pixel 8 Pro uses high-resolution sensors with pixel binning throughout its rear array. This isn’t so important from a detail perspective (though the larger sensor does collect more light); the camera shoots at 12MP unless forced otherwise. However, it does allow Google to crop from the sensor for “lossless” 2x and 5x zoom, albeit without the corresponding change in focal length.

The iPhone 15 Pro does something a little different with its primary sensor, combining detail from the 48MP raw resolution and 12MP binning resolution to output 24MP snaps. This also helps Apple capture more detail at increments up to 2x.

Google Pixel 8 Pro Apple iPhone 15 Pro

Primary camera

Google Pixel 8 Pro

50MP resolution (12.5MP binned)
ƒ/1.68 aperture
1/1.31-inch sensor
25mm focal length
Multi-directional PDAF
OIS

Apple iPhone 15 Pro

48MP resolution (12MP binned, 24MP output)
ƒ/1.78 aperture
1/1.28-inch sensor
24mm focal length
Dual-pixel PDAF
Sensor-shift OIS

Ultrawide camera

Google Pixel 8 Pro
48MP resolution (12MP binned)
ƒ/1.95 aperture

12mm focal length
Dual-pixel PDAF
125.5˚ field-of-view

Apple iPhone 15 Pro

12MP resolution
ƒ/2.2 aperture
1/2.55-inch sensor
13mm focal length
Dual-pixel PDAF
120˚ field-of-view

Telephoto camera

Google Pixel 8 Pro

48MP resolution (12MP binned)
ƒ/2.8 aperture
1/2.55-inch sensor
113mm focal length
Dual-pixel PDAF
OIS
5x optical zoom

Apple iPhone 15 Pro

12MP resolution
ƒ/2.8 aperture
1/3.5-inch sensor
77mm focal length
PDAF
OIS
3x optical zoom

Selfie camera

Google Pixel 8 Pro

10.5MP resolution
ƒ/2.2 aperture
1/3.1-inch sensor
20mm focal length
PDAF

Apple iPhone 15 Pro

12MP resolution
ƒ/1.9 aperture
1/3.6-inch sensor
23mm focal length
PDAF
OIS

On the ultrawide side, Google has a marginally wider field of view to fit more in. However, keeping distortion under control will be important to ensure that images look detailed and hold up well in dimmer lighting.

Zoom is where we see the most significant discrepancy in hardware. The Pixel 8 Pro has a much larger sensor, wider aperture, and longer focal length (for 5x zoom), making it undoubtedly the long-range winner. The iPhone 15 Pro doesn’t have Apple’s fancy new 5x periscope camera; that’s reserved for the Pro Max. However, the 77mm focal length can just about double up for portraits and may look better than Google’s implementation at medium range.

But enough with the on-paper differences, let’s find out which is actually better.

Pixel 8 Pro vs iPhone 15 Pro camera shootout

If you want to follow along with your own close analysis, you can find the full-res image samples in this Google Drive folder.

Primary camera capabilities

Right out of the gate, there are clear and obvious differences not in the quality but in the artistic look of the photos from these two phones. We’re using Apple’s Standard color profile, but even this targets a quite heavy color saturation and a high contrast level to boost whites and shadows for more pop.

Google’s color palette is more muted and realistic by comparison. The Pixel 8 Pro’s images certainly don’t jump out at you, but it’s more true to life and leaves plenty of headroom to apply your edits, if you’re inclined.

Apple’s familiar yellow tint and cooler blues remain, while Google’s white balance is still on the warmer side, as has been the case in previous years. While the two are pretty consistent in presentation, you’ll occasionally spot underexposed shots from the iPhone 15 Pro. This isn’t a problem with Apple’s HDR technology, though it’s still not the most consistent. Rather it’s at least partly down to its higher contrast approach to processing, which can push already dark elements of the scene further into the shadows. This is most noticeable in landscape shots. Still, Apple’s long-exposure and multi-frame technology is a boon for low light, which ends up with superior colors and fewer artifacts than Google’s Night Sight, which is still very robust.

While we’re looking at the main cameras, let’s take a quick look at fine detail. We’ll take a 100% crop from the iPhone 15 Pro’s 24MP and 48MP outputs and stack them up against the Pixel 8 Pro’s 12MP and 50MP options.

Even with solid lighting, the default snaps from the Pixel 8 Pro and iPhone 15 Pro aren’t entirely clean. You can spot a fair amount of sharpening and AI artifacts in the Pixel’s image, while the iPhone’s 24MP snap is noisy. It’s challenging to read the text in either, and both are generally a little too noisy to maximize their resolution claims in many pics I took.

Apple’s 48MP is more detailed, but there’s a heavy dose of sharpening and image cleanup that is a little hard on the eye. The Pixel 8 Pro’s 50MP image is the least processed looking while still preserving a high level of detail. However, these high-resolution modes only hold up well in bright lighting. Dim conditions produce a smudgy mess that’s worse than the 12MP image, hence why Apple and Google lock these options behind their pro mode toggles.

Returning to HDR, this is an area where Google has historically held a solid lead but there’s not a lot between the two when shooting in most scenarios. The two are mostly very good at balancing foreground and background exposure. However, push the phones into really tough environments with strong backlighting, and there are key differences.

In tough HDR environments, the Pixel 8 Pro is generally better at ensuring correct foreground exposure while still balancing the background. The iPhone 15 Pro is keener to avoid highlight clipping, even at the expense of subject exposure. However, flip on the portrait mode and the iPhone 15 Pro goes to lengths to ensure correct subject exposure in tricky environments. Details are noisy, but Apple’s better exposure and white balance make this the better shot of the two.

Speaking of portraits, Apple’s brighter exposure is highly desirable, but the consistent yellow tint is a detriment to realistic skin tones. Google’s approach can be too warm, particularly outdoors, but performs better in more neutral lighting. Both phones offer similar quality artificial bokeh, but I’d give the iPhone 15 Pro the nudge for smoother edge detection and more realistic soft roll-off.

Neither phone is particularly brilliant when it comes to skin textures. Google’s approach remains too oversharp, highlighting unwanted blemishes and imperfections. My pores aren’t that bad, I swear! Apple’s results are smoother, but this is mostly a result of noise, meaning you lose some fine details you may want to preserve, such as hair textures.

While both phones are capable of taking great-looking pictures with their primary lens, the Pixel 8 Pro is the more consistent shooter. It’s not always perfect, but you know what you’re going to get 99% of the time. Between oversaturation, underexposure, and yellow tints, Apple’s iPhone 15 Pro is more of a mixed bag.

Fitting more in with ultrawide

You’ll find the same color pallets on offer in the ultrawide department — the Pixel 8 Pro offers more balanced saturation but a warmer white balance, and the iPhone 15 Pro is cooler but occasionally looks too yellow. Both do a mostly decent job at matching the profile of the primary lens. However, the smaller sensor on the iPhone 15 Pro exacerbates the odd HDR issue, leading to plenty of areas of underexposure when shooting with the ultrawide.

As discussed in the initial section, the Pixel 8 Pro’s ultrawide provides a slightly wider field of view to squeeze more in, but both are sufficiently wide to fit plenty into the scene. Image clarity is more important with these extreme lenses, and both are so-so in that regard. The two suffer from a lack of detail and smudging at the frame’s edges, though I would say that the iPhone is a smidgen noisier. However, the Pixel’s wider lens suffers from more chromatic aberration when shooting into bright light. That’s just the trade-off for the extra FoV. Neither ultrawide lens offers much in the way of fine details; there’s a heavy reliance on denoise and sharpening to clean up the pictures.

I can’t say I’m super impressed by either of these ultrawide lenses. They’re fine as far as smartphones go, but between the additional distortion, lack of detail, and iffy color balance, I wouldn’t want to take many pictures with either. Then again, I’m in the camp that finds focal lengths wider than about 20mm pretty unnatural looking anyway.

Zooming in

Starting at 2x zoom, both the Pixel 8 Pro and iPhone 15 Pro employ a crop from their high-resolution sensors for a “lossless” zoom versus traditional digital upscaling. The results are generally pretty good, at least in good lighting, but the small pixels result in some noise and loss of detail. Google attempts to sharpen this up, while Apple is happy with a slightly softer look. You’re much more likely to see the aforementioned color difference than detail discrepancies.

At 3x, we assumed that Apple’s optical zoom would win out over Google’s image-blending approach, but this isn’t the case. The Pixel 8 Pro hands in just as much detail as the iPhone 15 Pro’s small 3x telephoto lens and actually wins out with lower noise and better dynamic range in trickier lighting conditions. That is quite an achievement, as the iPhone 3x zoom snaps look good in all but the dimmerest light.

As such, the iPhone 15 Pro’s zoom setup is passable at 5x, thanks to decent upscaling algorithms. Still, you can see an increasing lack of detail, even in good lighting. At 10x, the lens is a no-go. The Pixel 8 Pro is a clear winner at longer ranges. Its 5x optical resolution is super sharp, and cropping from the large image sensor holds up incredibly well at 10x, producing solid dynamic range even in less-than-ideal conditions, even if the details are a little soft.

While the previous two sections may have been a tossup in some regards, zoom is a slam dunk win for the Google Pixel 8 Pro.

Let’s not forget selfies

Selfies are perhaps the closest run contest between these two heavyweights, and both are very good. Details are slightly oversharp if you peep very close, even in bright light, but we’re looking at comparable skin tones and textures. Just like portrait mode, the iPhone 15 Pro’s brighter subject exposure works well and ensures a robust picture across a variety of lighting conditions. Google’s higher contrast look can result in underexposure and overly dark features when shooting against brighter backgrounds.

Both phones lose sharpness in lower light, though that’s to be expected from these smaller sensors. The iPhone 15 Pro’s color and saturation hold up quite well, while our Pixel 8 Pro snaps look a little washed out in the dark. Still, it’s hard to complain too much about either set of selfies here, they’re both two fo the best in the business.

Pixel 8 Pro vs iPhone 15 Pro camera: Which is the best?

Pixel 8 Pro vs iPhone 15 Pro in hand

Robert Triggs / Android Authority

There’s no denying that these two phones take great-looking snaps, but we are here to pick the very best, and there’s daylight enough between the two to place one above the other. When looking for consistency and quality over a range of shooting environments, the Pixel 8 Pro comes out on top. Neither phone is flawless, but Apple refuses to fix complaints we’ve had for generations, allowing the competition to leap past.

Not to mention that, with a new selection of manual shooting controls, the Pixel 8 Pro goes above Apple’s high-end offering in terms of making each shot your own. At least without resorting to RAW and an evening editing session. Priced $100 less than the iPhone 15 Pro as well, the Google Pixel 8 Pro should be the keen photographers’ preferred pick. That said, videographers may feel a little differently, but that’s another article.

Of course, there’s much more to these two phones than just their camera packages. Google’s Pixel 8 Pro doubles down on unique AI features you won’t find elsewhere, while the Apple iPhone 15 Pro continues to lead the field for outright performance. Check out our closer look at the Pixel 8 Pro vs iPhone 15 Pro if you still can’t decide between the two.

See price at Amazon
Google Pixel 8 Pro

Google Pixel 8 Pro

Excellent cameras
Fun, exclusive Android 14 customizations
Industry-leading update promise

Adblock test (Why?)


Pixel 8 Pro vs iPhone 15 Pro camera shootout: Which is the best 'Pro' on the market? - Android Authority
Read More

Nothing announces its OnePlus Nord rival ‘Phone 2a’, says it is better than Phone 1 - The Financial Express

Nothing made a bunch of announcements today. Stand-out among them was the official name drop of its next smartphone. The phone will be call...